🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.